Ubisoft Barcelona Made the Game That Saved the Franchise. Then Got Fired For It.

A Studio Success Story, Interrupted

Black Flag Resynced marks a recent critical highpoint for the series, making it the best-reviewed Assassin's Creed game since the 2013 release of the original Black Flag. It sold strongly in its first day and achieved significant concurrent player numbers on Steam within 24 hours of launch — representing a notable performance milestone for the franchise on the platform.

By any reasonable measure, that's a win. A franchise that has spent years stumbling — through Mirage, through Shadows's controversy, through a wave of cancellations — finally caught fire again.

Then Ubisoft laid off the people who made it.

What Happened

Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced launched on July 9, and Ubisoft Barcelona — responsible for the game's underwater exploration and tech — is set to lose dozens of employees in the coming weeks as part of the layoffs. According to tech and gameplay animator Manel Cota, the Barcelona team "did all the underwater levels" for the game, adding that the same team is being let go despite the game's success.

In response, the studio — represented by the Coordinadora Sindical del Videojuego union (CSVI) — began a strike on July 14 that ran through Thursday, July 16, during which the union attempted to negotiate with Ubisoft over the proposed layoffs. A significant crowd turned out for a rally outside Ubisoft Barcelona on the first day.

The demands were specific: cancellation of the proposed layoffs, a return to the studio's previous remote working policy, the granting of previously promised promotions and raises, and stronger job security.

The CSVI's public statement did not hedge. "Despite the game's commercial success, Ubisoft Barcelona workers will lose their jobs in the coming weeks," the statement read. "After an intense production, the company claims a 'strategic shift' to justify these layoffs. After years of dedication to our team, the company has turned its back on us. We will never see the fruits of our labour, and the reward for our hard work will be the loss of our jobs."

That's not a negotiating position. That's a funeral notice.

The "Strategic Shift" Defense Is Doing a Lot of Work

Ubisoft's line — "strategic shift" — deserves some scrutiny. Although the cuts became particularly resonant after Resynced's successful release, plans for restructuring were announced back in early June, when Ubisoft was also closing studios in Winnipeg and Belgrade and carrying out a reorganization of its Barcelona office. Ubisoft Barcelona is planned to be completely reoriented towards the development of Rainbow Six series projects.

In other words: the layoffs weren't triggered by the game failing. They were decided before anyone knew if it would succeed or not. That's arguably worse — it means performance was never the metric. The Barcelona team was always going to be repurposed regardless of what they shipped.

The job cuts affect a significant portion of the studio's staff, and the financial terms on offer haven't gone over well. A union representative told IGN: "The severance pay they're offering is far below the minimum expected, and below what they've offered for previously laid-off employees from the studio."

One anonymous employee put it plainly to Insider Gaming: "This is not an isolated event; it reflects a pattern of constant mistreatment, loss of talent, forced departures resulting from the erosion of workers' rights, and an increasingly top-down management culture that leaves employees with little voice in decisions affecting their work."

The Broader Pattern

Barcelona didn't fall into a vacuum. In February, Ubisoft laid off dozens of employees at its Toronto studio. Just a week earlier, a significant number of Ubisoft employees protested the company's controversial return-to-office policy. In January 2026, Ubisoft closed its newly unionized Halifax studio, eliminating multiple roles.

The Halifax detail is pointed. A studio that unionized got shut down. Barcelona struck, and was met with a severance offer described as below-minimum. Ubisoft Barcelona has a long history of supporting the publisher's larger studios, including Assassin's Creed, The Crew, Ghost Recon, and Immortals: Fenyx Rising. They've been a support pillar for years. That institutional knowledge is now walking out the door, some of it against its will.

This is worth stating plainly as opinion: there is something structurally broken when the risk of making games falls entirely on the workers and the reward flows entirely to the publisher. Ubisoft gets the headline of commercial success. The team that built the underwater sequences that critics singled out gets a below-standard severance check.

Why "Success" Doesn't Protect Anyone Anymore

The Barcelona strike punctures a belief that was always more consoling myth than policy: that if a team ships a good game, the studio is safe. What the Barcelona situation shows, in vivid real time, is that safety was never tied to quality of output. It was tied to whether the publisher had a future use for your skill set.

In early June, VGC reported that Ubisoft was closing its Winnipeg and Belgrade studios and restructuring its Barcelona office. As part of that report, it was revealed that Ubisoft Barcelona was set to be restructured to focus solely on Rainbow Six projects. The people who built diving sequences don't necessarily fit into a Rainbow Six roadmap — so they're out, regardless of the critical reception of the game they just finished.

The workers who remain will make Rainbow Six content. The workers who leave will have made one of the best-received Assassin's Creed games in a decade and gotten a substandard exit package for the trouble. That's the deal as currently constituted.

The strike generated significant visibility — community members outside a Barcelona office, union statements in international press, individual developers posting publicly on social media. Whether visibility translates into leverage is the open question. Ubisoft's track record in 2026 suggests the company is making these calls centrally and not reversing course based on public pressure.

---